Join The Community

Premium WordPress Themes

Search The Pelican Spectator

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

On the causes of overpopulation

Being a product of good Christianity and sufficient bible studies I am aware of the point the CBCP wanted to emphasize in their adamant obstruction against artificial birth control. Aside form being devotees of the taboos about life and procreation they are worrisome of the tolerance granted to youths who are then safe to engage on premarital sex with wild promiscuity.

Such things are reasonable, but, provided you have a country whose population is mostly composed with a great number of Christians-turned-covert-fornicators and poor couples killing pre-natal humans and throwing them in the thrash can or the drainage, there is no use capping the influx of man-made family planning devices. What the CBCP has to do is to reassess its stand on these issues, and divert their attentions to the concrete sources of the social problem such as the responsibilities of the media and the role of liberal materialism on people’s conviction and lifestyles.

I do not want to be viewed as a violator to the Biblical cautions against premarital sex, but the thing is that focusing much energy on the prohibition of artificial contraceptives will do nothing in a situation where the people, especially the youth, are already stalwarts of sexual ventures. And why are the Filipinos’ intrepid? Simple, because beleaguering influences have overran whatever Christian bearing they acquired from either good or bad parentage. And the Church, being itself the ancient dictator of faith, is losing its power of reinforcing morality. Instead it came to bark at the wrong tree, and the CBCP is the worst by doing it upside down. Instead of chopping the roots these cronies of mob rule are uselessly tearing on dead leaves.

The argument is that why do they keep on poking fingers at the moral holes of artificial family planning when the rest are doing procreation after procreation with or without the contraceptives? That is why these devices exist, because they are just merely supplying the demand of the masses, and the more these people are being influenced by the pornography legalized under artistic pretensions (give me a break, I am an artist and I know art when I see one, but not in those prostitutes legitimized by contracts advertising on TV) in both print and aired media the more the demands for condoms, contraceptive pills, cervical caps, IUDs, hormonal contraceptives and the like. I am not exonerating these things, but perhaps there are somethings more to blame, and the Church should not turn a blind eye on them.

In order to avoid fornication as well as married couples incessantly bearing babies like Gatling guns used in the Spanish-American War and sometimes half of which are not the husband’s turning into a fad (isn’t it already a fad today?) the Church must strike what needs to be struck first, to wit, the starting line where immorality and lack of self-control come from. And those are the vehicles that provide the stimulus to push harder and harder without thinking of whatever future lies ahead.

5 reacted:

What the CBCP (and the Catholic Church in general) needs to do is change its stand on using condoms and other forms of artificial birth control. I don't mean to be rude here, but the Bible does not express, in any way, that artificial birth control usage is wrong.
In fact, it tells us that couples should only abstain from sex if they are to dedicate themselves to prayer, ergo the rhythm method supported by the Vatican is wrong as well as unreliable.
Again, I do not mean to be rude. I'm just imparting what has been taught to me. God bless.

Battling pornography and a secular media steeped in adult content is good, yes. If we can change the way sexuality is wrongly portrayed in media, then we can cut down promiscuity in society.

But better still is spiritual formation and moral education. And the Church battling contraceptives is precisely part of fighting for life, since some contraceptives actually do take life that's already been conceived. And the Bible does say that you shall not murder.

Most forms of artificial birth control are ABORTIFACIENT. The Pill, for example, also creates a hostile endometrium which prevents the fertilized ovum -- which is already human life -- from implanting, resulting in an early chemical abortion. The Pill does not always prevent ovulation, and in these cases where the egg is fertilized, this back up abortifacient method becomes active.

Injectables such as Deo_provera, have this abortifacient cuntion too. The IUD works primarily by preventing implantation; it does NOT prevent ovulation. It is therefore clearly an abortifacient.

The Bible does not allow any form of artificial birth control In fact, it promotes the fecundity (openness to life) of marriage. Artificial contraceptives are clearly contrary to the fecundity of marriage as taught in the Bible.

Response to Manny's comment on this post:

The pill is an oral contraceptive. Its effects are systemic rather than localized. It just suppresses the normal ovulation cycle and does not in any way affect the endometrium. Pills are 98% effective but when taken inconsistenly will not affect the fertilization process, and once it fails there is no chance it will become active as a `back-up abortifacent,` whatever that means.

Ovulation is the process where an ovum is released from the ovary. It participates in reproduction but is not yet a human being except it is fertilized by a sperm cell/s.

The IUD is the one which alters the uterine environment so that the
fertilization of the sperm and the egg cell is suppressed. Although it does not prevent ovulation there is nothing to abort when there is no fertilization in the first place.

'The IUD works primarily by preventing implantations; it does NOT
prevent ovulation. It is therefore clearly an abortifacient.'

The conclusion does not follow the premises, non sequitur. Or if not so, ovulation without the sperm does not consist pregnancy which of course only occurs after fertilization.

Manny, the IUD prevents the ovum from being fertilized by suppressing the meeting of the egg and sperm cell. Ovulation does not mean pregnancy. No fertilization, no human being. That is why countries classify it as contraceptive and not abortifacient.

Abortifacients are chemicals like mifepristone and misoprostol, both known by the commercial name Cytotec, as well as pitocin(oxytocin), which promotes imminent abortion.


However Manny, I am one with you in the battle against articifial birth control for a slightly different theological and philosophical reason.

Here in us/canada, at the age of 30+, a lot of people still having a second thought having kids. It's not an easy responsibility - financially, morally, etc...

On the other hand, in my own opinion, in the Philippines, at the age of 20, some wants to get married right away, and even if you don't have a job, you will survive with the help of family, friends, and relatives. Sometime you don't even have take care of your kids by yourself, your family/relatives will do it for you. Your kids will learn without their parents guidance. Thats part of our culture. We are very dependent, relying on other people to do the job we should do on our own.

However, here in us/canada, you have to be independent, otherwise you will not survive and you'll end having miserable life. You have to take care of your kids on your own, guide them on everyday lives, school assignments, etc...

Its no wonder why most have one or two kids in their family and they get married around the age of 30-40

A lots of Filipino families here who had rebellious kids because they raised them in a pnoy way and they don't understand why they turned into something they don't like. Something like "anak bakit ka nagkaganyan".

Post a Comment

THE COMMENT SECTION IS UNDER MARTIAL LAW!
Though unmoderated, the webmaster of The Pelican Spectator reserves the right to delete comment posts containing foul language and/or engaging in personal attacks against a person or an institution. Accusations and allegations will also be dismissed unless otherwise supported by verifiable facts. The moderator will also remove comments that are off-topic, and contain product, services and blog promotion.